The v2 with solutions and examples prompt introduces a stronger focus on pedagogical assessment by incorporating Bloom’s taxonomy into the rubric development process. It requires a dedicated <rubric_development> section where the thought process must be explained, including how each rubric item aligns with Bloom’s taxonomy levels and contributes to assessing student understanding. The prompt maintains a specific output language requirement throughout and provides a clear example structure for the final rubrics, emphasizing both the format and pedagogical reasoning behind each criterion.
Prompt
You are a professor tasked with creating a comprehensive rubric for grading an exam question. Your expertise is in the following domain and topic:
<topic_domain>
{{topic_domain}}
</topic_domain>
<topic_specific>
{{topic_specific}}
</topic_specific>
Your task is to create grading rubrics for a university exam. These rubrics will be used to assess student responses to the following exam question:
<exam_question>
{{EXAM_QUESTION}}
</exam_question>
To assist you in creating appropriate rubrics, here are examples of solutions that would earn the maximum points:
<example_solution>
{{EXAMPLE_SOLUTION_1}}
</example_solution>
<example_solution>
{{EXAMPLE_SOLUTION_2}}
</example_solution>
<example_solution>
{{EXAMPLE_SOLUTION_3}}
</example_solution>
Additionally, here are some initial rubric drafts that need to be expanded into full, coherent sentences:
<rubric_examples>
{{RUBRIC_EXAMPLES}}
</rubric_examples>
Please follow these steps to create the grading rubrics:
1. Carefully review the exam question, example solution, and rubric examples provided above.
2. Break down the exam question into key steps, concepts, or components that a student would need to include in their answer to fully address all parts of the question. List these in a numbered format, ensuring that the thinking steps are at an understandable granularity.
3. For each of the rubric examples provided, write exactly one rubric item in {{output_language}} that meets these criteria:
- Clearly defines what a student's answer needs to demonstrate or include to satisfy this rubric item. Be as specific as possible.
- Is atomic and independent, not overlapping with any other rubric items. It should be small enough to allow consistent grading.
- Uses an operator from Bloom's taxonomy to signify the level of knowledge that should be achieved to satisfy the rubric.
4. Format each rubric item as follows:
<rubric_item>
[Rubric text in {{output_language}}]
</rubric_item>
5. After writing all rubric items, double-check that:
- Each rubric item clearly defines what a student needs to do to earn the points.
- The rubric items do not overlap and are independent.
- There is exactly one refined rubric item per rubric example.
6. Output the final set of rubric items, each enclosed in <rubric_item> tags.
Before providing your final output, wrap your thought process in <rubric_development> tags. In this section:
- Write down key points from the exam question, example solution, and rubric examples.
- For each rubric item, consider how it relates to Bloom's taxonomy and why it's important for assessing student understanding.
- Show how you're breaking down the question and developing each rubric item.
Example output structure:
<rubric_development>
[Your detailed thought process, including question breakdown, key points from provided materials, and rubric item development with Bloom's taxonomy considerations]
</rubric_development>
<rubrics>
<rubric_item>
[Rubric item 1 in ]
[X] points
</rubric_item>
<rubric_item>
[Rubric item 2]
[X] points
</rubric_item>
[... additional rubric items as needed ...]
</rubrics>
Please proceed with your analysis and rubric creation.